SEMINAR CURRICULUM
Clinical AI Governance. Six modules. Three delivered formats.
Constitutional RuntimeOverview
The ETHRAEON Clinical AI Governance seminar is structured around six modules that cover the constitutional runtime architecture, decision checkpoints in clinical context, the Ruling 1 IP posture, EU AI Act Annex III alignment, IEEE P7001 and P7002 alignment, and an implementation lab that demonstrates the runtime against a live evidence store. All formats share the same module set. Depth varies by duration.
The seminar treats governance as constitutional infrastructure rather than post-hoc review overlay. Every module ties to a working surface in the ETHRAEON estate that participants can inspect after the session.
Module set
Constitutional Runtime Architecture
The enforcement layer, the fail-closed defaults, and the evidence control layer overview. The runtime stops when unsure. Evidence is mandatory. Guardrails run at the runtime layer, not as a review overlay.
Decision Checkpoints in Clinical Context
Gate types (authorization, validation, audit, override) applied to clinical decision support, documentation drafting, and clinician-facing communication. Escalation routing to the licensed clinician and the certifying authority is enforced at the runtime layer.
Ruling 1 and IP Protection
Portfolio posture: 16 U.S. provisional filings, 73 specifications, 9 families. How IP-grounded governance frames constrain vendor lock-in, procurement risk, and technology transfer posture for healthcare organizations.
EU AI Act Annex III Alignment
High-risk AI classification under Annex III, Article 9 risk management obligations, and how constitutional runtime enforcement maps to conformity assessment structure. Regulatory conformity submission responsibility remains with the deploying organization.
IEEE P7001 and P7002 Alignment
Transparency of autonomous systems and value-sensitive design principles applied to clinical AI. How the constitutional runtime surfaces the transparency artifacts and privacy-adjacent design constraints these frameworks call for.
Implementation Lab
Live constitutional runtime demonstration. Compliance metric computation against a sample clinical workflow. Evidence trail inspection. Participants exit with a written reference to inspect the runtime posture against their own AI deployment surface.
Format matrix
| Format | Duration | Modules | Materials | Certificate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-Day Workshop | 8 hours | All six, full depth | Handbook, mapping worksheet, lab reference | Certificate of completion |
| 4-Hour Cohort | 4 hours | All six, focused | Handbook, mapping walkthrough | Attendance record |
| 90-Minute Briefing | 90 minutes | Modules 1 through 5, named-only | Reference sheet | Attendance record |
Who this is for
- Clinical AI teams and healthcare informaticists deploying AI where a wrong answer touches patient-facing narrative, clinical decision support, or documentation drafting.
- Regulatory professionals mapping AI deployments to EU AI Act Annex III, IEEE P7001, IEEE P7002, and equivalent frameworks under other jurisdictions.
- Healthcare IT operators, security, and audit functions evaluating governance posture for AI deployments in production.
- Procurement and technology transfer functions evaluating vendor governance posture and IP framing.
Scope note
Governance training, not clinical or regulatory training. The seminar covers the constitutional runtime and evidence control layer as governance infrastructure. It does not constitute clinical training, medical device qualification, regulatory conformity assessment, or an ISO 42001 audit. Clinical decisions, medical device certification eligibility, and regulatory submission responsibility remain with your organization and the applicable authority.
Engagement
Registration and delivery via the seminar surface. Format selection is confirmed after inquiry. Institutional and academic pricing tiers honored where applicable.